MP3war
There are interesting times ahead for the music industry. The Internet
has combined with new technology such as MP3 and CD burners to provide
ordinary people with the ability to create/pirate/exchange (delete
as appropriate!) music easily and cheaply. The music industry began
by simply taking pot shots at various websites such as MP3.com
and other small or amateur ventures who seemed to champion this
'pirate' technology. Legal battles have been bubbling away over
copyright infringement when along came Napster.
Napster allowed people to search each other's computers for music.
Each member of the service contributes their music to be freely
copied, and in exchange can help themselves to a copy of anyone
else's tracks. It's a distribution system of incredible efficiency
and diversity. It's a music library composed of millions of music
lover’s individual collections.

The music industry is worried, very worried. Here is a system that
threatens their livelihood. It has the potential to remove the middle-man
between the artist and the fans.Some argue that it threatens the
end of music making, and that unless the music industry can combat
this piracy it will die, and with it the artists. No more Britney,
Spice Girls or Boyzone. No more Hear’Say. Boo hoo.
Napster has been dragged to court and may not survive. Already
several rival music exchange systems and a public domain version,
which has no owner to sue, have flourished. The music industry are
discovering that stamping out this kind of freedom is not easy.
To aid in the anti-piracy struggle, The Coalition for the Future of Music has
taken out a series of adverts signed
by prominent bands such as Alanis Morissette, and Christina Aguilera.
They plead with the public not to steal music, to respect the musicians
livelihood, "If a song means a lot to you, imagine what
it means to us."
Despite massive repression, using the legal rulings and financial
muscle to destroy MP3 sites, the music industry is losing. A recent
round of skirmishes involved the music industry’s attempt to release
a format they could control; the Secure Digital Music Initiative.
This was opened up to hackers, who were invited (hackSDMI.org)
to break the code. Some boycotted the invitation on the grounds
that this was simply doing the job of testing the system for the
music industry, without them having to pay. Others accepted the
challenge and utterly smashed the code to the ground. While the
SDMI chimps are faffing about in admitting it had been cracked,
Salon.com reported an insider’s
remarks, “...it’s all broken”.
While the Coalition for the Future of Music's site advocate creative
freedom from major labels, member and executive of Artists Against
Piracy, Noah Stone said, "There will always be a place for a
major label, but it would be nice if they didn't have a stranglehold
on the business. But there is a place for them, and you don't want
to throw the baby out with the bath water."
But does the industry foster talent or rip people off? Courtney
Love, currently filing a lawsuit against the industries' standard
draconian contract comments, "Artists who have generated billions
of dollars for the music industry die broken and uncared for by
the buisness they made wealthy."
To further this point, in the UK an investigation into CD prices
is underway, as the Supermarkets accuse the music companies of perventing
cheap parallel imports. In the US, the
Washington Post carried the story, "Recently, the Federal
Trade Commission found that the major record labels had been artificially
hiking up the prices of CDs. A group of Connecticut music fans promptly
filed a $1.5 billion class action suit that accuses Capitol Records,
Universal, Sony, Time Warner and BMG of conspiring to overcharge
for CDs."
If we don't buy the bland shit they offer us, how can they afford
the luxury offices, the champagne dinners, the company limos, industry
parties, PR gurus and all the lawyers and so on? What is more annoying
is that their legal persecution is ongoing, despite the fact that
nobody yet knows if this type of file sharing service is a good
thing for sales or not. Some claim it actually helps
music sales. To underline the industries' incompetence all you
have to do is look at the sixties. Writer David Sinclair comments
in the sleeve to 'The
Jimi Hendrix Experience BBC Sessions' where, "it was also
widely believed that playing records on the radio too often would
actually discourage people from buying those records. After all,
went the argument if you can hear them on the radio for free, why
bother to go out and buy them?" Not exactly an industry of competence
or forward thinking is it?
One argument is that without the music business's investment in
music, then the talent they nurture will be stifled. People will
stop making music. Lets look closely at this myth. Firstly, the
music industry is just that - an industry. It is searching for a
formula that it can use and re-use to sell records to us. They don't
want to nurture new talent, they want to make money. Witness the
endless stream of boy/girl bands with perfect looks and constant
cover versions as testimony to this. Secondly, people have made
music for thousands of years before the music industry came along
and will long after it has died.
There is a future where the music industry is no more, where artists
are in control of their own destiny. That destiny may not offer
the vast riches that mega-stars enjoy today, but it will be a future
where musician's make enough money to earn a living, a livelihood
like everyone else. As Chuck D, front man of Public Enemy and Rapstation
prophesizes, "A million artists with a million labels."

Is the fact that our cultural spokespeople may never get catapulted
into a world removed from reality a bad thing? Is the fact that
they'll have to live with the rest of us, write songs about our
world and not get lost in self-adoration and mass market sales pressures,
a bad thing? Ultimately they will still be able to make a living
doing what they love and that can't be bad. Steve Albini, formerly
of 'Big Black' said on the sleeve notes to 'Pig
Pile', "To us, every moment we remained unfettered and in
control was a success. We never had a manager. We never had a booking
agent. We never had a lawyer. We never took an advance from a record
company. We booked our own tours, paid our own bills, made our own
mistakes and never had anybody shield us from either the truth or
the consequences. The results of this methodology speak for themselves:
Nobody ever told us what to do and nobody took any of our money.
We had a fucking blast, and blasted a few ourselves."
More Info Links:
BBC's beginners
guide to MP3
BBC's guide
to alternatives to Napster
Chuck D on Rapstation and
in the Washington
Post.
Guardian G2, 16th march
2001.
DMOZ.org's MP3 software
links
Wired's MP3 News Archive